BIND: Verskil tussen weergawes

Content deleted Content added
RAM (besprekings | bydraes)
kNo edit summary
RAM (besprekings | bydraes)
Lyn 6:
BIND is oorspronklik geskryf in die vroeë tagtigs met behulp van 'n [[DARPA|DARPA-skenking]]. In die middel tagtigs het werknemers van [[Digital Equipment Corporation|DEC]] verdere ontwikkeling van BIND oorgeneem. Een van die werknemers was Paul Vixie, wat aangehou het om aan BIND te werk nadat hy DEC se diens verlaat het. Hy was uiteindelik een van die stigterslede van die [[ISC|Internet Systems Consortium]], at uiteindelik die organisasie geword het wat verantwoordelik was vir die onderhoud van BIND.
 
Die ontwikkeling van BIND 9 is gedoen deur 'n kombinasie van kommersiële en militêre kontrakte. Die ontwikkeling van die meeste BIND 9 kenmerke is bevonds deur UNIX-handelaars wat wou verseker dat BIND kompeterend bly met Microsoft se aanbiedinge; die [[DNSSEC]]-kenmerke is bevonds deur die V.S.A se militêre magte wat DNS sekuriteit wou verseker.
<!-- Moet nog vertaal word
 
==Kritiek==
The development of BIND 9 was done with a combination of commercial and military contracts. Most of the features of BIND 9 were funded by UNIX vendors who wanted to ensure that BIND stayed competitive with Microsoft's DNS offerings; the [[DNSSEC]] features were funded by the US military who felt that DNS security was important.
LikeSoos [[Sendmail]], [[WU-FTPD]], and otheren systemsander datingstelsels backwat toterugdateer thetot earliervroeëre [[laissez-faire]] daystye ofop thedie Internet, het BIND 4 anden BIND 8 have'n hadgroot aaantal largekwesbaarhede numbergehad often seriousopsigte securityvan vulnerabilitiessekuriteit overen theword yearsdie andgebruik asvan suchhierdie theirvroeëre usestelsels is nowten stronglysterkste discouragedafgeraai.<ref>P. Hudson, A. Hudson, B. Ball, H. Duff: Red Hat&reg; Fedora 4 Unleashed, page 723. Sams Publishing, 2005 ISBN 0-672-32792-9</ref> BIND 9, beingwat ageheel rewrite,en hasal aherskryf is, is much'n betterbaie securityveiliger historystelsel.
 
==Criticisms==
Like [[Sendmail]], [[WU-FTPD]], and other systems dating back to the earlier [[laissez-faire]] days of the Internet, BIND 4 and BIND 8 have had a large number of serious security vulnerabilities over the years and as such their use is now strongly discouraged.<ref>P. Hudson, A. Hudson, B. Ball, H. Duff: Red Hat&reg; Fedora 4 Unleashed, page 723. Sams Publishing, 2005 ISBN 0-672-32792-9</ref> BIND 9, being a rewrite, has a much better security history.
 
==GeoDNS==
'''GeoDNS''' is a'n 40-linelyn patchbyvoeging totot BIND toom allow'n [[splitgesplete horizonhorison]] [[Domain NameDomein-naam System|DNSstelsel]] toe te laat, suchwat thatbeteken differentdat requestersverskillende receiveversoekers differentverskillende responses,antwoorde sal kry afhangende van hul nabyheid ten opsigte dependingvan ondie proximitybediener.
 
Op hierdie wyse kan 'n webwerf byvoorbeeld Franse gebruikers na hul Franse bediener en Koreaanse gebruikers na 'n Koreaanse bediener verwys. Dit verleen 'n beter werkverrigting en moontlik laer kostes as 'n bediener wat op 'n enkele plek geleë is of 'n [[rondomtalie DNS]] opstelling.
 
<!-- Moet nog vertaal word
 
In this way if a website has, for example, a French server, a US server and a South Korean server, they can easily specify that people in Europe go to the French server, people in East Asia go to the Korean server and those in the rest of the world be served by the US server. This can give improved performance and potentially lower costs than a single hosting location or a [[round robin DNS]] setup.
 
As it is DNS based, it is much easier to deploy than BGP anycast. It does not require any support from the ISP and will not break existing connections when the server selected for a particular client changes. However, as it is not intimately tied into the network infrastructure it is likely to be less accurate at sending data to the nearest server.