Wysiging soos op 09:29, 8 Junie 2007 bekyk bronteks Anrie (besprekings \| bydraes) 28 939 edits nog 'n bietjie vertaald (nog besig) ← Ouer wysiging		Wysiging soos op 09:45, 8 Junie 2007 bekyk bronteks Anrie (besprekings \| bydraes) 28 939 edits nog 'n bietjie vertaald (nog besig) Nuwer wysiging →
Lyn 72: * Balanseer onbeleefde opmerkings deur 'n sussende en opbouende opmerking by te voeg. * ~~'''~~Moet nie~~'''~~ beledigende en aanstootlike aanmerkings beantwoord nie. Vergeet daarvan en moenie die situasie vererger nie. * 'n Alternatief is om die onbeleefde aanmerking met 'n beleefde en respekvolle opmerking te beantwoord. Baie gebruikers sal hul fout insien en hul benadering aanpas. <!--- Word tog reeds in 1 gesê? * Ignoreer onbeleefdheid. Operate as if the offender does not exist. Set up a "wall" between the offender and the community. ---> Lyn 91: * Replace a comment made in an edit summary by another less offensive comment (''requires technical help'')---> === Vermaan die oortreder === <!---▼ ~~=== Caution the offender ===~~ If it is a clear case of ongoing incivility, consider making a comment on the offender's talk page. You may also wish to include a [[WP:DIFF\|diff]] of the specific uncivil statement. In extreme cases (of heavy or repeated incivility), a [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment#Request_comment_on_users \|user conduct Request for Comment]] may be useful to resolve the matter. Indien dit 'n duidelike situasie van aanhoudende onbeleefdheid is, kan u oorweeg om 'n opmerking daaroor op die oortreder se besprekingsblad te maak. Dit is ook raadsaam om skakels van wysigigingsverskille of spesifieke gesprekke by te voeg om na 'n spesifieke aanmerking in konteks te verwys. In uitsonderlike situasies, of situasies waar die persoon aanhoudend oortree kan u 'n ander, neutrale gebruiker vra om as bemiddelaar op te tree. ~~== Management of incivility during the mediation process ==~~ == Hantering van onbeleefdheid tydens die bemiddelingsproses == Parties sometimes attempt to negotiate an agreement while one party is not ready to negotiate. For example, if the source of the conflict is a specific point in an article, [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution \| dispute resolution]] may be impaired if discussion is still clouded by an uncivil exchange between both parties. It is best to clear up that issue as soon as possible, so disputants can regain their balance and clarity when editing.▼ Partye poog soms om 'n ooreenkoms te onderhandel, terwyl een party nie gereed is om te onderhandel nie. Byvoorbeeld, wanneer die bron van die konflik 'n spesifieke punt in 'n artikel is, mag [[Wikipedia:Geskiloplossing]] belemmer word as bespreking steeds deur onbeleefde kommentaar vervuil word. Die saak moet dus eers opgelos word, sodat betrokke gebruikers baland en duidelikheid tydens wysiging kan verkry. <!---- Engelse paragraaf hier onder... dit maak nie baie lekker sin nie ▲Parties sometimes attempt to negotiate an agreement while one party is not ready to negotiate. For example, if the source of the conflict is a specific point in an article, [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution \| dispute resolution]] may be impaired if discussion is still clouded by an uncivil exchange between both parties. It is best to clear up that issue as soon as possible, so disputants can regain their balance and clarity when editing.---> ▲<!--- === Explain incivility ===

Wikipedia:Beleefdheid: Verskil tussen weergawes