Content deleted Content added
EivindJ (besprekings | bydraes)
Lyn 75:
 
i am finding it alright to use but i sometimes use the old one becuase it is alot more flexible with extending it, but i mostly use it because of it's simplicity. If a certain city or town has no flag, coat of arms, or is missing something, this can be quite a problem with the infoboks. In my opinion , it's very useful , especialy for me , because i'm not fond with all the complicated ways of creating them. I think there are some things which might have to be fixed, like if nothing's entered it should stay blank, but overall... 7/10. i prefer it to the original , because i will only every use the older version when something about the city i can't find and i have to change it. I hope you understand. Thanks for your time! , by the way, if you need more 'advanced' opinions (since im only 14) , ask Voyageur. He is very proffecional and is better at creating city articles then me, he has also incountered problems with both versions and has used both. I hope this helps ^-^ [[Gebruiker:Africa South|Bezuidenhout]] ([[Gebruikerbespreking:Africa South|kontak]]) 20:35, 11 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, Africa South! I'm going to rewrite the template soon, simplifying it a little. I will then see if I can make more fields optional. --[[Gebruiker:EivindJ|Eivind]] ([[Gebruikerbespreking:EivindJ|kontak]]) 22:50, 11 Augustus 2008 (UTC)