Bespreking:Kopiereg: Verskil tussen weergawes
Content deleted Content added
Re: Levenswyer |
Dewet (besprekings | bydraes) No edit summary |
||
Lyn 30:
::::::::Maar, overnemen van een definitie uit een woordenboek is altijd toegestaan, omdat een definitie op zich niet voldoende is voor een auteursrechtelijk beschermbaar werk. [[Gebruiker:Danielm|Danielm]] 11:47, 12 Mrt 2005 (UTC)
Ek tree bietjie laat tot die gesprek toe, maar net 'n paar woorde van waarskuwing. Sover ek weet is SA 'n ondertekenaar van die Berne Konvensie op kopiereg en nog meer. Volgens [[:en:Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works]] geld die volgende:
: ''The Berne Convention provided that each contracting state would recognize as copyrighted works created by nationals of other contracting states. Copyright under the Berne Convention is automatic: no registration is required, nor is the inclusion of a copyright notice. The Berne Convention provided for a minimum term of copyright protection of the life of the author plus fifty years, but parties were free to provide longer terms of copyright protection, as the European Union did with the 1993 Directive on harmonising the term of copyright protection. The United States followed with the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998.''
'n Paar opmerkings vloei hieruit:
* Dis 50 jaar ná die dood van die outeur, nie 50 jaar ná publikasie nie. Dit is nie vir my duidelik hoe om 'n werk met veelvuldige outeurs (soos die HAT) te benader nie.
* Dit is reeds in die EU en VSA standaardpraktyk om die kopiereg nóg langer te verleng; in die VSA was dit 70-95 jaar, en die EU 70 jaar, en daarom is ek redelik seker SA sal ook soortgelyke stappe geneem het:
:: '''VSA:''' ''In the United States, the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 extended the duration of U.S. copyrights by 20 years. Before the act, copyrights lasted for the life of the author plus fifty years. After the act, copyrights lasted the life of the author, plus seventy years in the case of individual works, or 75 to 95 years in the case of works of corporate authorship and works first published before 1 January 1978. It also affected works still under copyright that were published prior to this date, increasing their term of protection by 20 years as well. This effectively 'froze' the advancement date of the public domain in the United States for works covered by the older fixed term copyright rules. Under this act, no additional works made in 1923 or after, and that were still in copyright in 1998, will enter the public domain until 2019. Unlike European Union copyright extension legislation, the Sonny Bono Act was not retroactive. It did not revive copyrights that had already expired.''
:: '''EU:''' ''The goal was to ensure that there was a single duration for copyright monopolies across the entire EU. The chosen term was that of Germany, which had the longest copyright term of any EU state, lasting 70 years after the death of the author. Unlike some other copyright term extension acts, this act retroactively restored copyright to works that had fallen into the public domain in their source countries (see grandfathering).''
* ''"Fair use"'' bestaan ook nie in SA nie, sover my kennis strek, so dit is nie 'n geldige argument nie.
Ons sal vir seker 'n regsopinie moet inwin voordat daar voortgegaan word met die gebruik van werke wat heel moontlik nog onder kopiereg val.
[[Gebruiker:Dewet|Dewet]] 12:03, 12 Mrt 2005 (UTC)
| |||