Electronic Frontier Foundation: Verskil tussen weergawes

Content deleted Content added
RAM (besprekings | bydraes)
RAM (besprekings | bydraes)
Lyn 38:
*[[Lawrence Lessig]]: EFF raadslid en professor te [[Stanford]]
*Raadslede: [[Brad Templeton]] (Voorsitter), [[John Perry Barlow]], [[John Gilmore]], [[David Farber]], [[Joe Kraus]], [[Lawrence Lessig]], [[Pamela Samuelson]] en [[Brewster Kahle]].
<!-- Moet vertaal word
 
==Kritiek==
Some other references are:
In sommige kringe word geglo dat die EFF hoër prioriteit aan grootskaalse veranderinge aan wetgewing ondersteun (soos die wettiging van moontlik ongemagtigde handel in lêers oor [[eweknie netwerk]]e) as om die misbruik van die wet te keer (soos in die geval van patentmisbruik en [[DMCA]] klagtes).
 
Die EFF se suksesse ter verdediging van [[Skylink]] en [[OPG]] teen misbruik van [[DMCA]]-wetgewing in die V.S.A asook hul projek om patente te daag demonstreer 'n daadwerklike poging om misbruik van wetgewing te voorkom.
 
<!-- Moet vertaal word
==Criticisms==
Some feel the EFF prioritizes wholesale changes to law (such as legalizing potentially unauthorized trading of copyrighted files over [[peer-to-peer]] networks, implying some change of the copyright laws) over stopping abuses of the law (such as stopping abusive patents and DMCA complaints). However, EFF's successes in its defense of Skylink and OPG against DMCA abuse as well as its Patent Busting project demonstrate real efforts to limit abuses of existing law.
 
Some in the anti-[[spam (electronic)|spam]] community criticize the EFF for officially opposing certain anti-spam techniques that do not deliver all wanted messages to the end-user. The EFF argues that the decision as to what is spam and what is not resides with the recipient, not intermediaries such as ISPs, and that there are efficient spam filters available to the end-user.