Wysiging soos op 06:32, 20 Junie 2006 wysig RAM (besprekings \| bydraes) 8 945 edits →‎Hoofondersteuners ← Ouer wysiging		Wysiging soos op 06:37, 20 Junie 2006 wysig maak ongedaan RAM (besprekings \| bydraes) 8 945 edits →‎Kritiek Nuwer wysiging →
Lyn 43: Die EFF se suksesse ter verdediging van [[Skylink]] en [[OPG]] teen misbruik van [[DMCA]]-wetgewing in die V.S.A asook hul projek om patente te daag demonstreer 'n daadwerklike poging om misbruik van wetgewing te voorkom. Sommige mense in gemeenskappe wat [[elektroniese gemorspos]] teenstaan kritiseer die EFF dat hulle amptelik sekere tegnieke teenstaan wat gemik is om gemorspos te verhoed. Die EFF se redenasie is dat die besluit oor gemorspos verteenwoordig altyd by die ontvanger moet lê en nie by tussengangers soos Internet Diensverskaffers nie en dat daar doeltreffende gemorspos filters aan die eindgebruiker beskikbaar is. <!-- Moet vertaal word Some in the anti-[[spam (electronic)\|spam]] community criticize the EFF for officially opposing certain anti-spam techniques that do not deliver all wanted messages to the end-user. The EFF argues that the decision as to what is spam and what is not resides with the recipient, not intermediaries such as ISPs, and that there are efficient spam filters available to the end-user. ~~Prior to the EFF's defense of ''[[2600: The Hacker Quarterly]]'' magazine in 2001, the hacker community criticized EFF as "[[missing in action]]" with regards to their legal troubles.~~ ==History, milestones, cases==

Electronic Frontier Foundation: Verskil tussen weergawes