Monoseksualiteit

Monoseksualiteit is ’n romantiese of seksuele aantrekking tot lede van net een geslag of gender.^[1] ’n Monoseksuele persoon kan óf as heteroseksueel óf homoseksueel identifiseer.^[2]^[3]

In besprekings van seksuele oriëntasie word die term hoofsaaklik gebruik as die teenoorgestelde van biseksualiteit, panseksualiteit of verskeie ander genderspesifieke of genderneutrale identiteite.^[4] Dit word soms as neerhalend of beledigend beskou, veral deur gay mans en lesbiërs.^[2]

Sien ook

Verwysings

↑ Zhana Vrangalova, Ph.D., 27 September 2014, Psychology Today, Strictly Casual: What research tells us about the whos, whys, and hows of hookups, Besoek op 2 Oktober 2014
↑ ^2,0 ^2,1 Hamilton, Alan (16 Desember 2000). "Monosexual". LesBiGay and Transgender Glossary. Bisexual Resource Center. Geargiveer vanaf die oorspronklike op 5 Augustus 2007. Besoek op 8 September 2012.
↑ May 22, 2014 by Samantha Joel, M.A., Psychology Today, Three Myths About Bisexuality, Debunked by Science: First of all, it's not a college phase, Besoek op 2 Oktober 2014
↑ Sheff, Elisabeth (2005). "Polyamorous Women, Sexual Subjectivity and Power". Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 34 (3): 251–283. doi:10.1177/0891241604274263.

Skakels

Hierdie artikel is in sy geheel of gedeeltelik uit die Engelse Wikipedia vertaal.

[twsPsychologyToday-1] Zhana Vrangalova, Ph.D., 27 September 2014, Psychology Today, Strictly Casual: What research tells us about the whos, whys, and hows of hookups, Besoek op 2 Oktober 2014

[brc-2] 2,0 ^2,1 Hamilton, Alan (16 Desember 2000). "Monosexual". LesBiGay and Transgender Glossary. Bisexual Resource Center. Geargiveer vanaf die oorspronklike op 5 Augustus 2007. Besoek op 8 September 2012.

[twsPsychologyToday2-3] May 22, 2014 by Samantha Joel, M.A., Psychology Today, Three Myths About Bisexuality, Debunked by Science: First of all, it's not a college phase, Besoek op 2 Oktober 2014

[twsJournalContemporaryEthnography-4] Sheff, Elisabeth (2005). "Polyamorous Women, Sexual Subjectivity and Power". Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 34 (3): 251–283. doi:10.1177/0891241604274263.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]